| Hey,
|
|
|
| > I can't think of a good reason why we would ever want the *listxattr()
|
| > syscalls to not provide security.selinux, if there is an individual
|
| > filesystem that is different/broken in this regard it should be
|
| > treated as a BUG and fixed.
|
|
|
| I've spoken to coreutils upstream[1], and they also seem to see this as
|
| something which should be fixed in the kernel too[2][3], and appear to
|
| want a soloution in the kernel rather than working around it in ls(1).
|
|
|
| Thanks,
|
| Rahul
|
|
|
| [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00011.html
|
| [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00025.html
|
| [3] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00031.html
|