Hey,

> I can't think of a good reason why we would ever want the *listxattr()
> syscalls to not provide security.selinux, if there is an individual
> filesystem that is different/broken in this regard it should be
> treated as a BUG and fixed.

I've spoken to coreutils upstream[1], and they also seem to see this as
something which should be fixed in the kernel too[2][3], and appear to
want a soloution in the kernel rather than working around it in ls(1).

Thanks,
Rahul

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00011.html
[2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00025.html
[3] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2025-04/msg00031.html